Butterfill

Monitoring and Controlling the Mental States of Others

Handout Slides

by Stephen A. Butterfill and Ian A. Apperly (24/01/2013), All Souls Metacognition Seminars at University of Oxford

Slides

Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image
Slide image

Abstract

The success of infants and nonhuman animals on some belief reasoning tasks may be best explained by a cognitively efficient but inflexible capacity for tracking belief-like states. In humans, this capacity persists in parallel with a later-developing, more flexible but more cognitively demanding theory-of-mind abilities. The later-developing ability clearly involves meta-cognition, both because it involves thinking about thoughts as such, and because it involves at least some conscious, controlled processes. In contrast the early-developing capacity may not be conscious or controlled, and may not involve thinking about thoughts as such. We will consider how these characteristics may explain the efficiency of the early-developing capacity, and whether this means the capacity is meta-cognitive in any meaningful sense.

Command Palette
Search for a command to run